Manufactured Approximately 1986 to 1987
Approximately 77 of these guitars were made. The design was way ahead of it's time.
 
If You Like Rand Guitars
You Will Love The Abstract Caligula

Abstract Caligula Replication Of The Rand
Principal Improvements on the Caligula over
the Rand
|
Rand |
Caligula |
| Rosewood fingerboards only |
Ebony, Maple, Brazilian Rosewood,
Fingerboard |
| Glue in set neck only |
Neck Through Body Design |
| Floyd Rose Bridge Only |
Choice Of Floyd, Kahler or Tun-a-matic |
| 1 Inlay design |
Your choice of any inlay design |
| EMG pickups only |
Seymour Duncan, EMG's or
anything |
| Graphic finishes & opaque
colors only |
Translucents, pearls,
graphics, anything |
| Right handed only |
Right or lefthanded |
| Binding not available |
Binding available on neck
& headstock |
| 1 Humbucker, 1 single coil
only |
Choice of pickups HH
HSS HSH or HS |
| Not available In a string
through body model |
Available in string
through body model |
| Only available in Maple |
42 different types of
tonewoods |
I
remember when I first checked out a Rand Guitar back in the
80's, I really wanted one. They were pretty spendy, but I
really liked the style & design, The only reason I held back was I
felt that for as much money as it was I wasn't going to settle for a
cheap rosewood fingerboard. I really am not a fan of rosewood, It has
it's place I guess. Just not on any of my guitars. The contours
and body carve were a real work of art.

I finally successfully
duplicated them after trying about 4 times. The compound contours are
trickier than a German carve. The balance is excellent and the neck
stability on the Caligula is an improvement over the Rand set neck.
The original Rand Guitar was probably the slickest guitar
ever to come out of the eighties, Built by a small builder
"Rand Havener" out of Pennsylvania. Rand was also responsible
for building those incredible guitars that Doyle & Jerry
of "The Misfits" used exclusively for years. This guy had
a real eye for design and detail. I dedicate the Caligula to him
and his radical designs.
The original guitars were quite well built but they were not neck through
body designed the way the new Abstract Caligula
is. The original Rand guitars were all built using a Pau Ferro
fingerboards. Also I have never seen one that had a bound neck. The Abstract
Caligula model offers stability & features that the Rand did not.
Neck thru body & solid tonewood construction makes this guitar a real
contender in today's market, Ebony fretboard & modern electronics really put
this guitar over the top.
Both guitars are sleek, light, elegant & comfortable to play !!!
There is no point in building something unless you can
do it better !! |

Ed Roman & Doyle Wolfgang Von Frankenstein, Holding Rand Annihilator
Models !!!
Hi Ed -
I know you're a stickler for truth, accuracy and the American
Way - so I'd like to correct a few items in your description of
Rand guitars on your website.
1. Only available in maple: Rand used basswood on at least some
of the California-built guitars of the mid '80s, but was open to
alternatives if that's what the customer wanted. I requested the
heaviest piece of mahogany he could find, and he obliged.
2. H/S pickup combination only: That was in fact standard, but
did you see the first one he built for Vivian? 2 - H. I could
have gotten that also but like the H-S combination.
3. Built in Pennsylvania: I believe all of the approximately 70
guitars of the design shown on your website were built in Rand
and Stacy's Newbury Park, CA shop which was located near Tom
Anderson's shop. That's where mine and Vivian's were built.
4. Pickups: He usually installed Tom's pickups in the
above-mentioned instruments, With a heavy body the bridge unit
was a bit too nasal for me. I replaced it.
Mine was one of the last guitars he built. I took delivery in
the summer of 1988, which is also the date on the headstock. I
actually like the Pau Ferro fretboard. As you probably know,
he's planning to start building again. And you're right, these
instruments were ahead of their time. The trem-setter was an
especially good feature.
The red example that you at one time had on your site looked
very much like the second one he built for Vivian. Do you still
have it?
I appreciate all the informative links on your site and hope
business is OK.
Regards,
Jerry Ritter
ED ROMAN RESPONDS
Hello Jerry
Thanks for your letter, when I met Rand
at the NAMM show in the 80's, he told me he was located in
Pennsylvania.
I agree with you I never liked those
Tom Anderson pickups either. They sounded compressed to me.
Maybe it's those oversize magnets he uses. I thought about
making pickups, it's easy and cheap to do. I just keep using
Duncan, EMG & Tom Holmes because I feel they sound better.
Personally the only thing that bothered
me about the Rand guitar was the set neck and the Pau Ferro
Fingerboard. Pau Ferro is just a fancy name for Bolivian
Rosewood. A premium expensive shred guitar should use ebony on
the fingerboard. If you have read any of my articles on my site,
I don't believe in set necks either. The glue in the neck
joint effectively separates the neck from the body causing a
loss in sustain and tonality.
Don't get me wrong it's still a great
guitar, but there is always room for improvement.
You are right he has started building
them again, $7,000.00 for a set neck guitar just doesn't cut it
my book, But I am sure he will do OK because a lot of people
will buy it just for the name.
Back in the 80's I wanted to buy some
of them, I resisted because Sam Ash had bought some. I know how
they operate. Usually they would take on a vendor like Rand for
example and sell them for very high money. Then a year or so
later they would get into an argument with the Vendor because
they would try to bully them into selling their product too
cheaply. So they would then dump whatever inventory they
had at below cost prices just to mess up the market. I saw them
do this with BC Rich 3 times, I never could figure out why BC
Rich went back and got beat up over and over again.
Today older BC Rich & Rand guitars
don't bring the money they are worth because they were marketed
improperly. The people who get hurt the most are the consumers
because the value of something that is more than 20 years old
should be a good deal higher. Especially a quality made guitar
like a Rand that is made at least 30% better than a Les Paul.
Check out one of my Caligula guitars, I
guarantee more Sustain and more overtones at half the price.
Ed
02/17/09 |
|